How
far does the primary and secondary research you have conducted support the
conclusions drawn from the article?
My Primary and Secondary research that I have conducted
support the 2014 OFCOM report, but there are some key areas of findings that
differentiates from it. For my first primary research, I conducted a survey on ‘survey
monkey’, where I asked questions to draw in some conclusions and analyse it
with the report. The purpose of this research was to see how young children
using social media, how many hours they use it for and which technology device
do they most prefer to use. In the 2014 OFCOM report, it focuses heavily on
Children’s consumption towards different forms of media, and by conducting this
primary research, I have proven that it does partly relate to the research
provided by OFCOM. Since I completed my secondary research first, I found that
the websites where I got most of my research from sort of contradict my primary
research. Overall, my survey was useful in some ways, because although it gave
me extensive research which I was able to compare with my secondary research,
some of the questions contradicted with the 2014 OFCOM report. In the 2014 report, it
heavily states that seven in ten children aged 5-5 now have access to a tablet
or computer at home. This statement partly related to my second primary
research which is an Observation I conducted while watching three of my cousins
in the living room (aged 5-11), and it showed them watching Television, but
they would often use their iPads or tablets between times to go on social media
and play app games. Since the article states that a lot of 5-15 year olds are
spending time online each day, I came to the conclusion on the report that my
observation report partly contradicted the report because even though my three
cousins all had their technology devices in front of them, they mostly
preferred to watch the TV, which then challenges the report as it talks about
children watching less TV on their Television and watching it more on devices
such as laptops, phones and iPads/tablets. I would say that my observation
findings supported the article more and drew in the most conclusions for me to
compare and analyse with the 2014 OFCOM report.
When conducting my Secondary
research, I used to websites from ‘the guardian’ and two websites from ‘the
independent’ and what I found was that although there were some areas in both
articles which I found very useful and trustworthy, some areas also heavily
contradicted with the 2014 report which made the information collected not
relevant. The research that I conducted in my ‘the guardian’ secondary research
partly relates to the report as it talks about the use of Television decreasing
by 5-15 year olds. It also undermines my primary research as more children
would prefer to use social media than sit in front of the TV. Although the 2014
OFCOM report spoke about how children aged 5-15 has consumed media over the
years, I found from my conclusions that the more children consume different
media the unhappier and antisocial they become. In the report it talks about
children aged 5-15 year old having access to tablets/iPads at home and spending
more time online, particularly on social media. This relates to my secondary
research as I found out that, young children spend almost eight and a half
hours a week online and how 72% of children under eight have used a mobile
device. One of the most interesting information I found while conducting my
secondary research is ‘More children now live in a household with a tablet than
any other technology media devices’. This differentiates with my primary
research, but it does not contradict to the report as children aged 5-15 spend
the majority of their time online. Overall,
the conclusions that I have drawn from both from my primary and secondary
research partly support the 2014 OFCOM report, as it talks about how children
from aged 3-15 like to consume the media and spend their time online, mostly on
social media. However, it also contradicted the report in some areas where it
spoke about how much time that children spend watching Television on their TV.
Explains the research findings & their relationship to the context of the article
ReplyDeleteClear links made as to the relationship between own research and article
Explains the article’s conclusions with detailed comment on the extent this is supported by the research
WHAT are the strengths and weaknesses of your findings - are they valid or appropriate in building on the findings of the report?
HOW relevant are your findings to the report?